As the Society’s Caribbean Representative I cannot help but weigh in on the debate going on in the United Kingdom following the impending referendum on whether Scotland should become an independent nation, which would of course put an end to the entity we now know as the United Kingdom and change the political face of Britain and Europe for years to come (assuming of course that the yes vote is passed), however after taking a look at some of the issues put forward by the Scottish nationalists, I’m convinced that the campaign is more of a scare tactic than anything else filled mostly with anti-English sentiment and does not represent all the facts. I’m by no means blaming the Scottish National Party (SNP) for all the misconceptions out there, but one thing is clear is that the Scots will be by no means better off should the vote go in SNP’s favour.
Many Anglophobes, not only in Scotland but all over the world, will no doubt be keen to support the ambitions of the SNP to be an independent country for no other reason than the fact that they still view English control of Scotland as a symbol of national subordination. However, those who do take this view do not truly understand the nature of the relationship between the two Kingdoms. In truth England does not dominate Scotland any more than Scotland rules England. The union between the two entities is not a forced one but one of mutual co-operation. Contrary to popular myths told to stir up anti-British sentiments, England has never annexed Scotland. Instead, the union between them is one that was approved by the parliaments of both countries to end hostilities and make the Realm a much stronger union than they would have had had they remained separate. The 1707 Act of Union is every bit Scotland’s doing as it is England’s, in fact, Scotland was keen to have the union of the two Kingdoms just to ensure that the English Parliament didn’t change the rules concerning the royal line of succession, which was in dispute at the time.